Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Criminal Appeals
    • Appeal Grounds
      • Bad Character
      • Complaint Evidence
      • Good Character
      • Extension of Time
      • Fresh Evidence
      • Hearsay
      • Negligent Legal Team
      • The Indictment
      • Sexual History
    • Criminal Cases Review Commission
  • Historical Abuse Cases
    • Historical Care Home Cases
    • Historic Allegations – Facing interview at the Police Station
    • Historic Allegations – Charged with an offence next steps
    • Historic Allegations – The Journey to a Not Guilty Outcome
  • News
  • Prison Law
    • Parole Hearings
    • Pre Tariff Sifts
    • Adjudications
  • Caselaw
Menu

Appeal Grounds

When you seek to overturn a wrongful conviction the challenge is often finding the right ground or grounds to persuade the Court of Appeal that the conviction is unsafe.

Your feeling of injustice, the errors you think were made, the failure to call the right witness, the fresh evidence you have or the Judges bias .... these may be the matters that keep you awake at night, but either individually or cumulatively they may not be enough.

It may be however, that lurking below the surface is a serious failing or ground that you have not even thought about. This requires a very careful and methodical approach.

What we set out are some of those key areas and legal grounds that could arise but it is important to realise that each case is different and no past decision of the Court can be a guide as to what it is likely to do if you get to argue your case before them.

Its a good place to start however ...............

Bad Character
Complaint Evidence
Good Character
Fresh Evidence
Hearsay
Indictment
Negligent Legal Team
Sexual History
Time Limits

Caselaw Spotlight - Hearsay Deceased Complainants

What if the Complainant who is making allegations against you has died by the time of your trial? Surely you cannot have a fair trial?

The Answer says the Court is that in most cases you can. In Horncastle v United Kingdom [2014] 12 WLUK 569 the Court held there was no infringement of a right to a fair trial where Complainants were absent. See also Riat [2012] EWCA Crim 1509

A key consideration for the Court had been whether the evidence to be admitted would be decisive or whether other evidence was available. The Court would have regard to the circumstances of the evidence and its reliability and it would not always be safe to assume such evidence would be admitted.

For example in R v Ibrahim [2012] EWCA Crim 837 - A conviction for rape was unsafe as the untested hearsay evidence of the complainant, who had died before the trial, should not have been admitted under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.116. In the light of the reliability of the evidence and its importance to the Crown's case, its admission had had such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings as to infringe the defendant's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.6(1). 

Where it is admitted it is important to ensure that the judge gives very careful directions and this should include in suitable cases identifying the questions the complainant would have been asked if they had been there.

Nowadays we know that the risk of a miscarriage of justice, a concept requiring no explanation is ever present. In earlier times courts sometimes approached the risk of a miscarriage of justice in ways which we would not nowadays find acceptable

Judgments - Regina v. Connor and another (Appellants) (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) Regina v. Mirza (Appellant) (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) (Conjoined Appeals) 2002 House of Lords

Categories

  • Articles and Speeches
  • Caselaw
  • Criminal Appeals
  • Historical Abuse
  • Miscarriage
  • Miscarriage Compensation
  • News
  • Resources

Contributors

  • 1 MarkNewbyQSJ
    • R v Osment [2021] EWCA Crim 705
    • R V CH [2021] EWCA Crim 635 fresh evidence text messages quashing convictions
    • Justice join strasbourg fight to end nightmare of the wrongfully convicted
    • The Shrewsbury 24 Case Warren and Others [2021] EWCA Crim 413 – Destruction of evidence and the preservation of all digital records in the future to prevent future injustices
    • CRYSTAL HUNNISETT (formerly known as David Andrew Hunnisett [2021] EWCA Crim 265 – CCRC Referral Psychiatric Evidence was not fresh and was flawed
    • R. v Mohammed (Ahmed)[2021] EWCA Crim 201- CCRC Referral Fresh Evidence DNA Phone
    • R. v Sakin (Ilhan)R. v Gardrie (Muctarr)[2021] EWCA Crim 411 – Reopening a previous Appeal Decision – mistake
  • 1 sjsharp1309
    • The Criminal Purgatory – Release Under Investigation – is the end in sight?

Our Justice Tweets

My Tweets

Contributors

  • 1 MarkNewbyQSJ
    • R v Osment [2021] EWCA Crim 705
    • R V CH [2021] EWCA Crim 635 fresh evidence text messages quashing convictions
    • Justice join strasbourg fight to end nightmare of the wrongfully convicted
    • The Shrewsbury 24 Case Warren and Others [2021] EWCA Crim 413 – Destruction of evidence and the preservation of all digital records in the future to prevent future injustices
    • CRYSTAL HUNNISETT (formerly known as David Andrew Hunnisett [2021] EWCA Crim 265 – CCRC Referral Psychiatric Evidence was not fresh and was flawed
    • R. v Mohammed (Ahmed)[2021] EWCA Crim 201- CCRC Referral Fresh Evidence DNA Phone
    • R. v Sakin (Ilhan)R. v Gardrie (Muctarr)[2021] EWCA Crim 411 – Reopening a previous Appeal Decision – mistake
  • 1 sjsharp1309
    • The Criminal Purgatory – Release Under Investigation – is the end in sight?

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,525 other subscribers.

Blogroll

  • CCRC
  • F.A.C.T
  • Facebook Page
  • Innocence Network UK
  • QualitySolicitors Jordans Website

Social Media Links

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Contact

QS Jordans
4 Priory Place
Doncaster
DN1 1BP
01302 365374
info@jordansllp.com

Most Used Tag Posts

abe appeal appeals bad character Caselaw ccrc ccrc referral court of appeal Criminal Appeals criminal exploitation directions disclosure dna ECHtR expert evidence extension of time fairness fair trial False allegations featured fresh evidence guidance hallam hearsay Historical Abuse identification evidence indictment jury discharge justice loss of control mark newby Miscarriage miscarriage compensation mistakes murder nealon nullity nunn post conviction disclosure provocation sentence sexual abuse sheikh stay strasbourg substantial injustice unsafe victor nealon written directions wrongful convictions
@Crime Jottings imagined by Corewebs
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT